| |
|
|
|
|
AT ISSUE
- September
2001 by Thomas Sowell
With police on hand to try to maintain order, the Loudoun County (Virginia) board of supervisors recently imposed severe restrictions on the building of homes, despite angry protesters. The boards plan allows only one house to be built for every 10 acres in some places and for every 20 or 50 acres in other places. Opponents of these restrictions accused the supervisors of violating their property rights. One of their signs read: Thou shalt not steal. Property rights are one of the most misunderstood things in law and one of the most disregarded things in politics. The vast amount of land that the Loudoun County supervisors are micro-managing does not belong to them or to Loudoun County. It belongs to its respective individual owners. According to the United States Constitution, the government cannot take private property without compensation. However, judges have been letting governments get away with doing just that for about half a century now. So long as the title to the property remains in the hands of its owners, the courts let local, state and federal governments do pretty much what they please, even if that destroys much of the value of the property. From an economic point of view, there is no real difference between confiscating half of someones property and reducing its value by half. When county officials drastically restrict the uses to which land can be put, that land becomes less valuable on the market. A farmer cannot sell his land to someone who wants to build an apartment complex if the county regulations make it illegal to build an apartment complex. When the use of land is restricted to ways that only the wealthy can afford, that eliminates a major part of the demand for that land and a major part of its value. Such restrictions also increase the value of the existing estates of the rich. California pioneered in such restrictions, years ago, which is why California real estate prices and apartment rents are out of sight. But
Loudoun County is one of many other places that are now
catching up, using the same legalistic techniques and the
same political rhetoric about the environment, preventing
sprawl, and other pieties that beguile the
gullible. |
|
|
Copyright 1996-2001, by Kentucky Business Online. All rights reserved. Editorial
content is copyright 2001, Lane Communications Group The Lane Report is a trademark of Lane Communications Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. |