underwriters1.GIF (5491 bytes)
lanelogo2.gif (2774 bytes)

banner.jpg (13863 bytes)

 

redbar.jpg (1753 bytes)

kybizsidebar1.jpg (12694 bytes)

lr_banner.jpg (4313 bytes) lanesidebar1.jpg (12171 bytes)

home_sq.jpg (6100 bytes)

ONE-ON-ONE - December 2002
by Ed G. Lane

'Society's Expectations from Industry, and Tobacco Specifically, Have Changed'
Brown & Williamson CEO Discusses corporate Responsibility

Susan M. Ivey
As president and chief executive officer of Louisville-based Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Susan Ivey runs the third largest manufacturer and marketer of cigarettes in the U.S. The Brown & Williamson company is a subsidiary of British American Tobacco plc, based in London.

Ivey has served as the head of international brands and manager of the global strategies for State Express 555, Lucky Strike, Kent, Benson & Hedges, Pall Mall and regional brands including John Player Gold Leaf and Barclay. Notably, Ivey was also marketing director for British American Tobacco in China from 1994-1996.

Ivey is an executive committee member of Bellarmine University and Greater Louisville Inc. and involved in the Greater Metro United Way of Louisville as campaign chair for 2003.



Ed Lane: Brown & Williamson was founded in 1893. In 1927, Brown & Williamson (B&W) became a subsidiary of British American Tobacco (BAT) – a London-based corporation. That same year, B&W also relocated its U.S. operations to Louisville from Winston-Salem, NC. Why did B&W originally move to Louisville?

Susan Ivey: At that time, Kentucky was the second largest tobacco-growing state, and Louisville had the river and the port. When B&W moved, our employees took the Saturday train to Louisville and started work on the following Monday. B&W was quite an industrious company, even in those days. We’ve been in Louisville ever since and had a factory here until the early 1980s.

EL: Is that when B&W opened a manufacturing facility in Georgia?

SI: Yes, B&W’s only manufacturing facility is now in Macon, GA.

EL: With the efforts of community leaders and Greater Louisville, Inc., Louisville and Jefferson county are experiencing a period of resurgence. Why is Louisville faring so well?

SI: I’m delighted to see the growth in Louisville. As you may know, I lived here from 1981 until 1990. I then went overseas for 10 years and came back in the middle of 1999. And certainly during the ’80s there were several attempts in Louisville to revitalize the downtown. The Galleria project was one of the first efforts and Brown & Williamson stepped up to that. We were actually going to move out to the east end and we took this building and have been committed ever since that time to downtown Louisville.

As we have established a vision for the city, Louisville has made a lot of progress. We’re not Nashville or Indianapolis yet, but we’re going in the right direction. The merger is underway and Louisville has a solid base of employment and employers with outstanding commitment to the community. Louisville has a good platform in terms of the arts, social systems and philanthropic organizations. To ensure that Louisville can attract the talent that is needed to keep businesses like Brown-Forman, Tricon, B&W, UPS and the healthcare industry here in Louisville, it’s important that the city thrive and invest and become more of an urban center.

EL: You’re recruiting people from around the world to work for your company. How important are arts and education in this effort?

SI: When you are recruiting people with families, the education system is critical and certainly something everyone evaluates. The arts, and even restaurant facilities, are very important because businesses are recruiting graduate students and MBAs to the community – many who do not yet have families. To have a thriving young professional environment is important to that long-term recruiting effort.

EL: What benefits do you see will be created when the city and the county merge together?

SI: The benefits of the synergy will be inevitable – not only economically but also in terms of focus. One entity focused behind a common goal is – almost without exception – better than two entities that perhaps have different visions.

EL: Burley tobacco has been a major component of Kentucky’s economy since the 1800s. What do you perceive to be the long-term future for tobacco growers in Kentucky?

SI: Kentucky is still the second largest state in the union for tobacco. U.S. tobacco will always be a critical component of U.S. cigarette trademarks. I’m making the assumption that U.S. burley doesn’t price itself totally out of the world market. U.S. burley is not easy to find elsewhere; it’s not that substitutable and gives our products the flavor and the quality that our consumers enjoy. This applies not only to our products in the United States but also to the cigarettes that are exported.

EL: British American Tobacco is the second largest tobacco company in the world and has facilities worldwide. Does B&W serve or market to a specific geographical area?

SI: I run only the U.S. business, but our B&W factory in Macon does make certain brands and blends that are shipped overseas. B&W supplies the Japan market, almost in total for British American Tobacco, and we also have other exports that go to the Middle East and Europe.

EL: What is the finished product?

SI: It’s fully-made, packed cigarettes with the appropriate warning for that destination.

EL: How has “contract buying” changed the tobacco industry and what are the benefits of this program to B&W?

SI: It’s interesting because last January this program didn’t exist, certainly for Brown & Williamson. One of our competitors started a portion of its business in contract growing and B&W decided that we better get out there and contract our farmers.

B&W could have been without adequate tobacco, but more critically without the quality and particular grades of tobacco that we use in our blends. In 2001, B&W contracted about 80 percent of its requirements and bought the remaining 20 percent at auction.

Our contract growing requirements are bigger than just for Brown & Williamson U.S.A. On behalf of British American Tobacco, we also contract the U.S. tobacco that our sister companies want to use in their local manufacture. BAT’s U.S. tobacco usage is greater than B&W’s domestic cigarette volume.

Contract systems have been used in other parts of the world and BAT is quite familiar with contract arrangements, which was good for us. Now, we buy the whole plant from the farmer. Trying to get other people who want the bottom, if you want the top, and trading with you to get your recipes right, worked out for us much better than we expected in 2001. The risk in the contract system is that there is waste, but B&W has been able to minimize that waste. Relationships between tobacco farmers and Export Leaf, which is our leaf division, have always been strong. BAT buys tobacco in northern Georgia, Kentucky, Virginia and West Virginia. We’ve been pleased with the way the contract system has developed.

EL: How will this program affect tobacco warehousemen and auctions?

SI: Tobacco will always be auctioned. So, there will still be an auction system, but it will be much consolidated.

EL: How has contracting affected the price of tobacco?

SI: It’s actually gone up slightly. And that’s because contact buyers had to become middlemen, in a sense. We had to create the infrastructure to take on the tobacco, the transportation still costs, and we had to be competitive with the pricing. In the future, there could be some more efficiency in the market, but I don’t think contracting is going to be a big cost saver.

EL: What happens when a farmer sells his crop to B&W?

SI: The leaf is brought into Wilson, NC, which is where B&W does the processing. And then it is stored, because you don’t take tobacco out of the ground, run it through those machines, and then send it to the factory. B&W has storages in Blacksburg, SC and Richmond, VA. Normally the tobacco is stored 12 to 15 months and cured. Tobacco is an organic product, so it rests, and then it’s delivered to the factory.

EL: How many employees does B&W have in the U.S. and Kentucky and what are long-term employment trends at B&W?

SI: We have about 5,000 employees nationwide. Here in Louisville, we have about 400 that are full-time staff and then about another 200 contractors, so we’re employing about 600 people in Louisville.

EL: What is the benefit of using contract labor?

SI: Efficiency. For example, B&W uses the Pitney-Bowes organization as a facilitator of our services, and they bring a lot to the party. Having an external view of your processes helps you determine how they can be done more efficiently.

EL: How is B&W’s sales force organized?

SI: B&W has 22 section offices and 1,500 to 1,600 people in our field sales organization.

EL: Because of bad publicity regarding health issues and tobacco, has B&W had a difficult time recruiting new employees?

SI: About five to eight years ago it was more of an issue than it is today. People are very clear on, “yes, I will join the tobacco industry,” or “no, I will not.” Certainly there are a lot of people who choose not to work in a controversial industry, not just tobacco but of any kind, and then there are people who look at the company’s policies and the company’s position and understand the issues that they’re joining and come quite open to that. And I would say B&W had a bigger problem with the tech drain. There was simply no talent available during the past three years. And now, of course, in the past year and a half we’ve gotten every MBA graduate that we’ve offered. They’re coming.

EL: BAT’s most recent financial report for the period ending September 30th showed operating profits to be down by one percent, but overall profits were up about eight percent due to lower interest rates and the absence of exceptional charges. Worldwide, BAT’s cigarette volumes declined four percent or about 23 billion units. So, how do you see the worldwide trend going?

SI: Well, there are two components at play. In established and more mature markets, the volume is declining around one to two percent per annum. But, that doesn’t mean there’s not a fight for market share, which of course can grow volume. In the less mature markets, consumers are switching from local brand business to international cigarette brands. So, there are opportunities for share growth for the big international players like British American Tobacco which operates in more than 180 countries around the world.

EL: Some governments operate tobacco companies and there seems to be an interest in privatizing that business. Is that one of the growth areas BAT is investigating?

SI: I can’t really speak for the shareholder, but BAT – even in its recent third quarter results announcements – has always talked about acquisition and merger growth as part of its strategy to become the worlds No. 1 tobacco company.

EL: Brown & Williamson’s slogan is “a responsible company in a controversial industry.” Could you describe what that means specifically?

SI: Sure. The phrase is used actually across BAT. It’s a recognition of the controversiality of the industry. British American Tobacco and Brown & Williamson have been committed to being a good corporate citizen, to being socially responsible in the way it goes to market with its products and responsive to the communities where it works and lives. B&W supports a constructive dialogue in an attempt to societally come to terms with tobacco as a product category.

Tobacco is a legal product, it’s smoked by legal aged adults, and we have a legal right to be able to communicate about this product. What has happened is that society’s expectations from industry, and tobacco specifically, have changed over the years. And the tolerance that people have for the way the industry has gone to market have changed over the years. B&W’s slogan is our commitment not to market to kids, to make sure our consumers have the information they need to make adult choices, and to engage in a social reporting process that encourages a dialogue with various stakeholders. Is B&W going to shut the doors tomorrow morning? No we are not, nor should we. But we are trying to find a basis of understanding to be able to have some dialogue to see if we can’t co-exist in society, where we meet each others’ expectations, understanding that smoking is a personal adult choice.

EL: Some medical doctors have stated that regular smoking can reduce a person’s life span by five to 20 years. How do you deal with that? What is B&W’s position regarding health issues facing smokers?

SI: At Brown & Williamson, we were the first to be as clear as anyone could be to say that it is our position that smoking causes disease. And that is very clearly stated. We were the first to put these positions out on the Web site. And we’ve always said that smoking was a very risky behavior but, of course, that answer was not seen as sufficient and clear in communication. And of course we were looking at it, at that time, from sort of a manufacturer’s perspective. If I knew what it was in smoking that made some people sick and some people not, I’d love to be able to take it out of the cigarette. But nobody knows that after 150 years of research. And we’re very clear that based on epidemiological evidence, certainly smoking can cause disease. Our position is to be certain that consumers have the knowledge they need to make personal choices about smoking.

EL: Tobacco companies continue to be sued by consumers who allege that cigarettes have caused illnesses and premature death. Tobacco companies have successfully defended against these claims. What is the outlook for future health-related litigation?

SI: We’ve had individual lawsuits against tobacco companies since sometime in the ‘50s. And I believe we’ll always have individual lawsuits to deal with. What is going away and will continue to go away are class-action lawsuits. We continue to see courts disband these classes because it’s simply an inappropriate mechanism.

EL: Under the Master Settlement Agreement that the major tobacco companies entered into with the 46 state attorneys general, how much does Brown & Williamson have to pay under that agreement?

SI: Our payments are based on B&W’s market share (percent of all cigarettes sold in U.S.). Since 1998, B&W has paid over $2.8 billion dollars under the agreement.

EL: Is the amount paid annually, monthly, in a lump sum?

SI: It’s paid in arrears; payments are due for the preceding year in April. The liability is accrued quarterly and it’s big numbers. B&W had to design a turn-around strategy for the sustainability of the organization because big numbers like that really whack you around.

EL: Please define B&W’s current business strategy, “Fight for Growth.”

SI: B&W’s plan is to make sure that it has products that are superior to its competition in the segments in which we have elected to compete. We couldn’t compete in all segments, so B&W had to focus on specific brands.

EL: With regard to the marketing of tobacco, are point-of-sale efforts the most critical since advertising is limited?

SI: Yes, there’s a real battle at retail because B&W can’t use outdoor – that was lost in the Master Settlement Agreement. We do have some magazine advertising, but B&W self-restricts that medium to limit the exposure to under-age. Direct marketing to adult smokers and being able to interface with those adults in nightclubs and restaurants is also effective.

EL: What is B&W’s position on banning smoking in public buildings, restaurants, and bars?

SI: I’m a proponent of having smoking and non-smoking places, particularly in restaurants, because the non-smoker should have the choice. For B&W, the bars are an opportunity to interact with consumers where they can enjoy or try our product.

EL: For how many years will the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) be in place?

SI: It’s really in perpetuity. Now, there are pieces of the MSA that go away. Those are called the up-front payments that only the “big four” tobacco companies were subjected to.

EL: There’s a suggestion going around now that Kentucky may raise taxes on cigarettes because the state had a major revenue shortfall and no money left in the “rainy day” account. What impact would a 50- to 75-cent a pack increase have?

SI: That’s a huge tax increase. Politicians need to sit back and recognize the role that tobacco plays in the state of Kentucky. It has been traditional and is the case today, that the big tobacco states – North Carolina, Virginia and Kentucky – have had relatively low tobacco taxes. These states benefit versus the non-tobacco producing states in terms of sales, jobs, and the rollover of money generated from tobacco. In the end, the politicians, who represent the people, need to decide the state’s tax policy. Cigarette taxes are regressive; I’m opposed to them.

EL: What does the future hold for B&W?

SI: B&W is proud to be the only major cigarette manufacturer in Kentucky. Phillip Morris pulled out of Louisville; they’re gone. B&W is committed to helping create a thriving economy in Louisville and the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

 


Ed G. Lane
is chief executive of Lane Consultants Inc. and publisher of The Lane Report.
edlane@lanereport.com

Back to One on One Index


Back to the December Issue

 
 

Copyright 1996-2002, by Kentucky Business Online.  All rights reserved.

Editorial content is copyright 2002, Lane Communications Group
All editorial material is fully protected and must not be reproduced in any manner without prior permission.

The Lane Report is a trademark of Lane Communications Group.  All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.